The greed of the army may possibly clash with the greed of the global owners of capital; and it seems to me that this is a good thing to try to aggravate.
The usefulness of military dictatorship to manage the investor conquest of the country is obvious, but may be short-sighted considering the army’s own economic interests.
So long as Sisi uses the army’s economic resources to support the implementation of the neoliberal program (providing foodstuffs and transportation at discounted prices to offset the damage caused by suspending subsidies, for instance), they are not in conflict with the interests of the Empire of Capital. However, if the army becomes in any way a competitor to the multinationals, this would be the beginning of the end of military rule.
Revolutionaries should explore ways to draw the army into economic competition with foreign business. This could potentially be accomplished, again, by targeting multinationals and sabotaging their ability to provide goods and services. This could create market opportunities for the army, depriving multinationals of the market share they expect the army to deliver to them; thus making them competitors.
The Empire of Capital cannot tolerate competition, and they have the power to crush the army’s economic stake in Egypt and remove them from the government