The appropriate role of opposition political parties is to articulate a critique of the present regime, and to draft alternative policies, explain them, and to map the way towards achieving them. It is not their role to incite violence or command escalation of revolutionary activity.
Every successful revolutionary movement compartmentalizes its activity between a political wing and a military wing.
If your party does not have sufficient membership to establish a military wing, it obliges you even more to articulate the policy platform of your party, to enlist support for your particular vision and program, so that, if it is justified, you may eventually be able to establish a group dedicated to confrontational action in support of your goals.
Otherwise, you are merely a demagogue, inciting whoever will listen to you, without any real direction; you will achieve no objectives, because you have no objectives. You will not advance any policy program, because you have no policy program.
If you have a militant group without clear political objectives, I’m afraid you are simply a force for instability.
Disruption must be connected to specific demands; that is what makes it revolutionary rather than just chaos.