“…in Italy, a warlord was a “prince”. The same, of course, held true throughout Europe. They were not “warlords” they were “lords” and “dukes” and all manner of other such royal titles, up to and including “kings”. Their counterparts, with identical degrees of power and authority deriving from identical methods of control, were referred to as “warlords” if they happened to live in Asia, Africa, or Arabia. So the term is clearly based on a subjective and ideological bias. If Prophet Muhammad had been a European, he would have been royalty…”
External Context سياق خارجي